ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÁÖÀ§ °ñ °á¼ÕºÎÀÇ À̽ÄÀç Å©±â¿¡ µû¸¥ Àç»ý È¿°ú ºñ±³ ¿¬±¸
The comparative study -the regenerative effect depends on size of bone graft material in bone Loss site around dental implant
¿ÀÈ«±Õ, È«±â¼®, Á¤ÁøÇü, ÀÓ¼ººó,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¿ÀÈ«±Õ ( O Hong-Kyun ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç
È«±â¼® ( Hong Ki-Seok ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç
Á¤ÁøÇü ( Chung Chin-Hyung ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÓ¼ººó ( Lim Sung-Bin ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç
KMID : 0363020080380030493
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate on the regenerative capacity by using different size of graft materials around bony defect around implant.
Material and Methods: Dental implant fixtures(Bio-TIS, Korea) were placed into the tibia of 8 rabbits. After placement of implant, artificial defects were created for each group, and the size of bone graft materials were used according to each designated group. 4 weeks after surgery, 8 rabbits were sacrificed. The histologic and histomorphometrical study were done for comparison of the regenerative capacity using 80-90§ and 200¡1000§ size of grafting materials of OCS-B¨Þ.
Result: Matured bone formation was significantly increased more in Group E1(80-90§) than in Group E2(200¡1000§). Group E1(80-90§) showed more significant augmentation in marginal length of graft material per unit area than Group E2(200¡1000§). Group E1(80-90§) showed more interspace in graft material than Group E2(200¡1000§). Control group showed no new bone formation around and inside of implanted fixture.
Conclusion: Small grafting material size has great influence on bone regeneration.
Å°¿öµå
Regenerative capacity;dental implant defect;Bone graft materials
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸